Showing posts with label jj abrams. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jj abrams. Show all posts

Thursday, 27 June 2013

Stuff that Annoys Me 2


“It wasn’t made for you”

In relation to television I’ve heard this excuse used a couple of times. One of these was from Matthew Graham. In response to the negative reaction of the older fans to his episode of Doctor Who “Fear Her” he said  "Well, it's a shame that they have, but it wasn't meant for them"

Let me explain why this statement holds absolutely no validity whatsoever. Doctor Who is the most popular Science Fiction show I the UK and draws in viewers of all ages. To even suggest that it would be alright to let down half these viewers for the sake of impressing the other half is just plain stupid. It’s also an insulting thing to say to a fan of the show. Graham is implying that there’s nothing wrong with how he wrote the episode, but that those who reacted badly to it are the ones with the problem. He could have reacted to the criticism by asking himself what he did wrong and what he could have done better. Instead, the only thing he seems to have asked himself seems to be, “what could possibly be wrong with the people who didn't like my work?”

Also, looking at the episode more specifically, the main antagonist (Chloe Webber) suffers from a constant fear that her dead, alcoholic, abusive father will come back to life and beat her to death. Written for the kids was that Matthew?

Star Wars is going to be the same again

With his latest Star Trek film, JJ Abrams has proved that he has no understanding of subject matter, deeper meaning or character motivation. He knows how to put on a loud light show and that’s exactly what Star Wars has been for the last few years anyway. Abrams would appear to understand as little about what the original Star Wars meant as George Lucus, to be honest.

The fact that people are obsessed with twilight and not Buffy

From the first to the third season of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, there is a love story constantly running between the characters of Buffy and Angel. When broken down to it’s core elements, this love story is essentially the same as that Bella and Edward in Twilight. However, it is executed so much better in Buffy. Like Bella, Buffy is in love with a dangerous vampire who struggles with his own love for her, not to mention his bloodlust and true demonic nature. Unlike Bella, Buffy is able to draw a line between love and complete and utter devotion. She is capable operating without Angel, she regularly addresses the fact that they shouldn’t be together simply because he’s 226 years older than her  - yeah the fact that Edward Cullen is a paedophile for purposes US law is never addressed is it?

Buffy is essentially a far better role model than Bella, she exists in a similar universe and even goes through the same love story, but comes out of it as a stronger character, whereas Bella just concludes that it’s about time she surrendered everything to Edward and embraced traditional marriage.

Monday, 27 May 2013

Star Trek: Into Darkness - SPOILER WARNING!!!


The more I think about this movie the worse it seems to me. Sure it’s fun enough to watch and the action scenes and special effects are all top notch. But the more thought you put into it, the more you realise that JJ Abrams has no idea what he’s dealing with and through that shows no understanding and more importantly no respect to the original films.

In order to talk about this, I’m gonna have to spoil the major twists of the film, so don't read this if you haven’t seen it. Ok, no bitching about spoilers, I’ve warned you.

So John Harrison is actually Khan. This is the first point at which Abrams pisses all over the fan base. Everyone thought this was going to be Khan and rather than using that as a hook he chose to lie about it, then reveal it almost immediately after the character appears on screen.

Thing is, this isn’t Khan. This man is the Joker, or Loki or Mr Silver. A man with an elaborate plan which involves wanting get caught in order to use his opponents as a way of getting what he wants.

This kind of villain stood up in other films, like the Dark Knight and the Avengers, because the central protagonists had a lot of development to do themselves. The central cast of Into Darkness don’t develop at all.

Closer to home, while Benedict Cumberbatch is doing the best with what he’s given, he only seems to have been hired for the job his voice can score 6.5 Ian McKellens on the awesomeness scale.

Wrath of Khan, showed us a villain who was ten times as intelligent as his adversaries, but massively flawed in regards of his ego. In that respect, this film also repeats the end of Wrath of Khan, word for word, with two of the characters swapped. Mr Abrams, that is not paying homage, that’s just ripping off a far better film.

Wrath of Khan was an inter-textual story about, ego, aging, sacrifice and overall appreciating what you have. Into Darkness doesn’t even compare on this, with a thin story about some crazy admiral in Starfleet and the most important villain of the whole franchise being used as a name-drop.

In conclusion, while I got along just fine with the film while watching it, having thought about it now, I can only see it as an insulting use of a villain, whom the writer/director has no understanding of.